The Truth About the Health Care Bill

by ARP Team Leader
posted on Monday, November 01, 2010

The Truth About the Health Care  

Well, I have done it!  I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009.  I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law.  I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional.  What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying.  The law does provide for rationingof health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system.  All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals.  Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface.  In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices.  Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated.  If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government.  The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with!  I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital.  All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures.  You can also forget about the right to privacy.  That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you.  It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th AmendmentHowever , that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law.   It doesn't stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people.  Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.  This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights.  Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation.  If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas


WE MUST HOLD CONGRESS ACCOUNTABLE BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.



COMMENTS


Injection of astronomical agents in reform of system of the public health services, assuming introduction of the obligatory medical insurance for each American, will be wrapped by excessive tax burden, will cause uncontrollable expenditure of budgetary funds and will cause inflation jump.
Posted by Adrian Mcdonald  on  12/06/10  at  10:51 AM

I have been and will continue to be skeptical about any violations of the 4th amendment. I'm still shocked there hasn't been more of an uproar yet about the legality of domestic wiretapping...
Lars
Posted by Seasons Change  on  12/20/10  at  11:32 AM

I think both parties should stop playing politics.
Seizing power I doubt... 200 years has gone by and some things should be changed.
Others should remain, as those you mentioned.
Posted by nursing masters degree  on  12/30/10  at  03:02 PM

I do not agree with wire tapping either. What if this personal information got in the hands of the wrong people?

sarah
Landlord insurance
Posted by Landlord insurance  on  01/04/11  at  11:29 AM

This will make for a great case.
Robert
Posted by Orlando Bankruptcy Attorneys  on  01/05/11  at  12:50 PM

This is acceptable agreeable of accessible advice that will advice abounding I am sure. You do acceptable assignment in your articles. Thank you for sharing.
Services Ordinateurs Montreal
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  01/08/11  at  03:06 PM

There are three species or types of property: land, improvements to land (immovable man-made objects, such as buildings, and personal property movable man-made objects. Real property also called real estate or realty means the combination of land and improvements.
Posted by term life insurance quotes  on  02/10/11  at  03:29 AM

Modern property rights are based on conceptions of owners and possession as belonging to legal persons, even if the legal person is not a natural person. In most countries, corporations, for example, have legal rights similar to those of citizens. Therefore, the corporation is a juristic person or artificial legal entity, under a concept that some refer to as "corporate personhood".
Posted by Best Forex Trading Robots  on  02/14/11  at  12:24 AM

The Health Care Bill must meet the needs of ALL Americans and if not, it is indeed failing to do its job, which is essentially to give equal opportunity to everyone. Policymakers are not responding to changing demographics of the United States and they are definitely not understanding Latinos effect within the current system
Posted by seo companies  on  02/15/11  at  09:34 AM

A paragraph added at the last minute to the health-care bill is causing a road block with many of the lawmakers. The paragraph which promised a $100 million dollar promise in form of federal government aid for extra poor people joining Medicaid in Nebraska is being questioned by many including the Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson who says he has not asked for it and would like to do away with it.
Posted by phlebotomy schools  on  03/15/11  at  05:49 AM

Real health care reform is the thing we’ve fought for from the start. It is desperately needed. But this bill falls short on many levels, and hurts many people more than it helps.
Posted by Shrugs and Boleros  on  06/17/11  at  08:17 AM

Once student stop opting for the medical field, schools will cut back back on medical science programs. Which will result in less schooling and scientific discoveries, and so forth. All it takes is a basic understanding of supply and demand to see the larger picture.
Posted by Luxury Villas South of France  on  06/17/11  at  08:25 AM

I think the entire reform is not a good idea. I know most people think it will decline cost of medical care and it will be like it is in Europe, but US is not like one of those European countries therefore the same rules can not be applied to us.
Posted by Online RN to BSN  on  09/26/11  at  05:50 PM

The truth is the country an not afford it without going bankrupt!
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/16/18  at  12:43 PM

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

YOUR COMMENT:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Comments are subject to moderation and approval.
Spam, Advertisements or material unrelated to this comment or the concerns of the ARP and its members will be deleted!
We remind everyone that The American Reform Party promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid using ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

Next entry: Dallas Texas solution to Illegals…Brilliant!!!!

Previous entry: Arab/Islamic United Nation members consistently vote against the United States

<< BACK